A federal judge in California ruled Monday that the federal government is allowed to share basic information about Medicaid participants with Immigration and Customs Enforcement amid a government push to locate people it believes are in the country unlawfully.
The plan to share information from the federally backed program had been blocked by a preliminary injunction that applied to 20 states that sued, including California.
U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria partly denied the states’ request for a preliminary injunction Monday, writing that “basic biographical, location, and contact information” is legal under the law.
But he also granted the injunction as it pertains to any information beyond that.
“We are disappointed in the court’s decision allowing for the sharing of some Medicaid data with ICE,” the office of California Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a statement Monday.
“Though we are gratified that the court enjoined DHS’s broader efforts to obtain more sensitive health data; data of citizens, lawful permanent residents, and other people with lawful status; and data from other CMS administered health programs,” Bonta’s office said, referring to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Monday’s order notes that the Medicaid services agency, CMS, has said in a notice that it “will share the minimum required information,” such as “citizenship and immigration status, location, and phone numbers.”
Immigrants unlawfully in the United States are largely not eligible for Medicaid.
All states are required to offer emergency Medicaid — temporary coverage that pays only for lifesaving services in emergency rooms — to anyone, regardless of immigration status.
Emergency Medicaid spending accounts for less than 1% of the program’s expenses, according to a study published in October in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Chhabria’s order notes that basic information is something that the Department of Homeland Security, the agency that governs ICE, has always had the authority to request.
Chhabria also said in his partial order that there are many unanswered questions.
“Beyond the basic information discussed above, the policies are totally unclear and do not appear to be the product of a coherent decisionmaking process,” he wrote.
His order grants a preliminary injunction against sharing information of broader categories.
